please do note that application is on layer 7 and it has nothing to do with layer 3 or the routing algorithm underneath.... the application only knows how to connect to destination IP and destination port..
please do note also that TCP has a session state... going out with different final source IP or different final destination IP breaks the session.. if you want M:1 ratio... then you have to apply policy based routing on source IP and source port.. if you have two outband links.. let say.... all even source port goes to outband link 1 and all odd source port goes to outband link 2.. fooler. On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Michael Tinsay <[email protected]> wrote: > Two things: > > 1. This means I cannot use parallel+rsync in a straightforward manner, as I > would need to have multiple rsync sessions with different destination > subnets. > > 2. This assumes a 1:1 ratio of comm lines for both sites. I do not have > that ratio. Besides, the aggregate upload speed of all the DSL lines in > site A will not saturate the download speed on any DSL line in site B. So a > M:1 ratio is desirable. > > ... > > One other thing, I would prefer if there is a "turnkey" solution out there. > A last resort. if sorts, I'm thinking of is set up my own private bittorrent > tracker, but that may get out of hand really fast when the number of files > grows. For now I'm research Bittorrent Sync and its FOSS alternatives. > > > --- mike t. > > > > > ________________________________ > From: fooler mail <[email protected]> > To: Michael Tinsay <[email protected]>; Philippine Linux Users' Group > (PLUG) Technical Discussion List <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, 3 February 2015, 9:32 > > Subject: Re: [plug] site to site folder sync > > each link have its own network block... assuming link A is 1.0.0.0/24 > and link B is 2.0.0.0/24... your destination server have two network > interfaces (or one interface with an alias or vlan tagging) and > allocate an IP for each link's network block.... in this case.. > interface one is assign to 1.0.0.1 and interface 2 assigned to > 2.0.0.1... > > when your destination hostname or IP is 1.0.0.1... then it goes to > link A .. if your destination hostname or IP is 2.0.0.1.. then it goes > to link B.. > > fooler. > > fooler. > > > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Michael Tinsay <[email protected]> wrote: >> Do you mean using the parallel command with the rsync command? Possible, >> but how will you assign which comm line a specific rsync stream to use? >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Rogelio M. Serrano Jr. <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, 3 February 2015, 5:58 >> Subject: Re: [plug] site to site folder sync >> >> Gnu parallel rsync? > >> >> >> >> >> _________________________________________________ >> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List >> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug >> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph > _________________________________________________ > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph > > > > > _________________________________________________ > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
