Michael Robinson wrote: Web, Goose, and Xerxes are gateway, mail server/proxy, gateway respectively. This is the original network's means of accessing the Net.
I think this piece is complicating matters. It seems you've got multiple NICs these boxes on different networks? Which in the absence of a router and switch/hub I understand. But if you could centralize your routing it would make this a lot less painful. > In a nutshell, I want to be able to route from the original > network in Scappoose, it uses black lines in the DIA diagram, > to a host on the other side of the VPN tunnel implemented by > the FVX 538. > Original network is 192.168.0.0 / 24? > There is also the problem of making 192.168.0.x and 192.168.1.x > link together ( Scappoose side both networks ). > How do you mean? A router has a leg into both networks so hosts can communicate across net boundaries? Or do you mean by putting them on the same network by making the subnet smaller such as 192.168.0.x / 22 > This problem makes my head hurt. Renumbering my side may not be > such a bad idea after all. I detect a few errors in the HOWTO > I mentioned by the way. The hardest part to figure out for > double nat is what the source nat rule needs to be. > > Okay, so the DIA diagram only deals with relevant machines on > the Scappoose side and does NOT cover the Minnesota side at all. > Right now, that side is a black box to me. Okay, so the picture is getting a lot clearer. Thanks! Unfortunately, I can't seem to open the attachment. When I attempt to open my box sees it as an ASC file? I tried to rename it to DIA file. Dia the sees it as a supported file type but errors when trying to open it. _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug