Tony Rick wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Tim Wescott <t...@wescottdesign.com> wrote:
>
>
>> You are extracting individual characters out of rawInput by getting a
>> pointer to a character array, then getting characters 'the C way'.
>>
>> Yet the string class has a character extraction operator -- why not just
>> use rawInput[i], or rawInput.at(i)?
>>
>>
>
> ...or iterator members rawInput.begin() and rawInput.end() to avoid using
> size() at all?
> modified example from the string RefMan entry:
> string::iterator it;
> for (it = rawInput.begin(); it < rawInput.end(); it++) {
> if (*it == 0x2e) {
> etc, etc, etc
> }
>
> - tony
>
Indeed, I should have mentioned it. I _thought_ it, but then I thought
it'd be hard to explain, so I didn't pursue it.
That's probably how I'd carry out the task, if I couldn't use the
higher-level parsing functions available from string (like find, substr,
etc.). I'd have to think about it to know if they could be used to
advantage -- I do nearly all my C++ work in small embedded systems where
use of the STL is anathema.
--
Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
Voice: 503-631-7815
Cell: 503-349-8432
http://www.wescottdesign.com
_______________________________________________
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
