On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 12:42 -0700, Larry Brigman wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Keith Lofstrom <kei...@kl-ic.com> wrote: > > > I run Scientific Linux, "SL", a Red Hat Enterprise Linux clone. > > The most widely used clone of RHEL is CentOS, but there may be > > troubles in that community. We are getting about 5 refugees a > > day from CentOS showing up on our mailing list and forums. > > > > Any CentOS users here? I'm hoping the tales of woe are > > overblown, and CentOS is still healthy and moving forwards. > > If something happens to SL, I would rather not have RHEL as > > the only practical alternative. > > > > I use Centos 5 at work. We have a mix of it RHEL5 and Oracle Unbrakable > Linux 5. > > Most of the noise on the Centos ML is due to the lateness of release Centos > 6.
I gather CentOS-6 is close. See these tweets from one of the main developers -- http://twitter.com/#!/centos Thought I read somewhere that the expected time through QA is about a month. Nevertheless, the delay in CentOS-6 suggests that their updates might not be timely. Thanks, Mike _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
