Before buying anything, it might be a good idea to have a peek inside
to see how many antenna wires are connected to the current card. If
you do, please share a photo.

On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 5:58 PM David Fleck <dcfl...@protonmail.ch> wrote:
>
> That's a strong possibility; I'll probably spend a few more days poking 
> around at this, and then order that card or similar - I also found somebody 
> on Ebay selling what they claim is an Intel adapter taken from an EliteBook 
> 8560p for just a few bucks.
>
> Thanks for the ideas, everybody.
>
> --
> - David Fleck
>
>
> On Tuesday, September 24th, 2024 at 7:52 PM, Russell Senior 
> <russ...@personaltelco.net> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 5:38 PM David Fleck dcfl...@protonmail.ch wrote:
> >
> > > Using the Ookla speedtest site on a browser, my current laptop gets about 
> > > 40-60 Mbps; the EliteBook gets about 0.2 - 0.4 Mbps. So I wasn't kidding 
> > > about 2 orders of magnitude. Using simple pings around the local network, 
> > > the EliteBook seems ok; ping response time is in line with the other 
> > > machines, packets aren't getting dropped during the ping tests.
> > >
> > > It may be coincidental, but I noticed that twice during the times I was 
> > > running the speedtest on the EliteBook, the Internet connection on other 
> > > devices in the house dropped. Other times I ran the test, the connections 
> > > were fine. So I wonder if there is some kind of interference going on, at 
> > > least sometimes.
> > >
> > > I'm using 2.4GHz for the all the laptops in the house because the 2.4 
> > > signal seems to degrade much less with distance from the router than the 
> > > 5Ghz.
> >
> >
> > One advantage of the 5GHz band is that, because it doesn't propagate
> > through walls as well, you aren't getting channel contention from
> > outside your house as much.
> >
> > I'd consider trying to replace the radio with one of the intel mini
> > pcie cards, like the one I linked somewhere above in this thread.
> >
> > --
> > Russell Senior
> > russ...@personaltelco.net

Reply via email to