You have 2 choices in spam filtering

1) Draconian filtering this is what Google and Sophos and all of the commercial 
spamfilter providers do.  It keeps virtually all spam out of the inbox.  But it 
DOES have a lot of false positives.

2) Light filtering.  You won't get all spam from inbox you will get some.  But 
you won't get false positives.

Most corporations purchasing commercial spamfiltering do option 1.  But there 
are ALWAYS user complaints roughly I get 1-2 a week from my 300 user base 
saying variations of "I'm missing a confirmation mail" or some border 
condition.  Since all filtered spam is quarantined, my sysadmin has to waste 
time digging around in the quarantine to find that One Good Email and release 
it.

If we try adjusting it so it does not false positive - that is more to option 
#2 -  we get MORE complaints the opposite way - people asking "why am I getting 
so much spam" when they are complaining about 2-3 spams a WEEK in their inbox.  
But worse is that there's always going to be that ONE user out there who 
believes the cornpone spam and falls for it and clicks the link or makes the 
call and causes more mess for us to clean up.  That's why we and most other 
orgs have ended up using option #1, draconian filtering.

In your case, you COULD do the same thing our users do and complain to Google, 
hoping that another human than yourself would dig around releasing your one 
good email from your quarantine.  Of course, the difference between our users 
complaining to us and your complaining to Google is you don't pay anything to 
Google thus Google will tell you to pound sand and dig through your own trash.  
With us our users pay our salaries so we can't do that.

Perhaps there is a market out there for a new service, call it 
"emailspoiledusers.com"  The way it would work is users like you would pay 
actual humans to periodically read all the crap in your spam filter and release 
the .0001% of good mail to your inbox.   Hmmm I think I should patent that 
idea....lol

My advice is to view this as the cost of a free and unfettered email system on 
the Internet.  Look here.  Don't you realize how incredibly free it is that 
ANYONE IN THE WORLD can type out an email basically saying virtually ANYTHING 
to you and send it to you and you will get it?  I can point to dozens of 
politicians - our very own First Citizen Trump #1 among them - who would KILL 
for the ability to set his Maggaoots free to "make sure you got clean unspammed 
email that only said the correct things to you"

What we have had for the last 25-30 years or so on the Internet is freedom of 
ideas that have NOT been gatekeeped, that for the last oh say 10,000 YEARS of 
civilization has been denied to people by Those In Charge.  It has toppled 
governments, bankrupted companies, and done more good for humanity than pretty 
much any 1 thing previously that has come along.

And before you get complacent, keep in mind in Portland OR right here we have 
the last 2 editors of the largest daily newspaper in the state - the Oregonian 
- who have turned off blog comment responses to their stories on their online 
newspaper - precisely because they got upset that their power to gatekeep 
stories was being usurped, because every time one of their reporters posted an 
online story on Oregon Live that concealed the real reasons for something, the 
blog readers would comment in response and call out the lying that was being 
done.

Not everyone in the world is happy with the general populace having the power 
to know truth and the moment they get a chance to hide truth, they take it.  
They have NOT learned their lessons in the last 25 years and are still scheming 
to try and turn the clock backwards to the bad old days.  To them - people like 
the Oregonian Editors - truth is a bad messy thing.

I don't think that dealing with a couple dozen advertisements for hair tonics 
that were written by AI computers with an IQ of 20 that any 5 year old can see 
are baloney, in your email box every week, is too much to ask in exchange for 
this freedom.

Ted


-----Original Message-----
From: PLUG <[email protected]> On Behalf Of American Citizen
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2026 1:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PLUG] question on blocking spam mail

Ever since I sent electronic mail to my insurance company last July, my mailbox 
is still being flooded by spam mail. Just recently 53 spam emails hit in just 
one day.

If you examine the headers, they all appear to be coming from some computer 
network of people who have intimate knowledge of email servers and how to take 
advantage of the loop-holes in the email protocols.

Is it worthwhile to try to contact Google, since it is google which is okaying 
the forward on this spam, and ask them to start blocking?

My current email program (imap) is NOT blocking the incoming content, since 
google did put them into the SPAM folder, but occasionally a good email slips 
into this batch, so I cannot simply choose to auto-erase the content of the 
spam folder.

Your thoughts?

Randall




Reply via email to