http://www.pcworld.com/resource/printable/article/0,aid,107517,00.asp
the FUD goes on... :) there are some notable inconsistencies in the report too: <snipped_content> IDC found Linux more economical than Windows in the area of Web serving. That is probably due to the popular Apache Web server, which is often acquired for free, Wheeler said. IDC has published research in the past showing that some companies that replace Unix systems with Linux can save twice as much as those that move from Unix to Windows. </snipped_content> how could apache be more economical than IIS when in fact IIS is already built into Windows NT/2000? this kind of reasoning doesn't make sense (remember Microsoft's previous tagline "making it all make sense"?) -dre _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Searchable Archives With Friendly Web Interface at http://marc.free.net.ph To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
