> how could apache be more economical than IIS when in > fact IIS is already built into Windows NT/2000? this > kind of reasoning doesn't make sense (remember Microsoft's > previous tagline "making it all make sense"?)
'Coz Apache is 'built into' Linux? And Linux itself is free or much cheaper compared to NT/2K... I myself would advocate a mix of machines for an enterprise depending on specific needs. There are clearly many areas where running Windows is less of a headache than Linux (and vice versa). That said, my goal is to remove the dependence on Windoze in our business as much as possible without compromising anything. _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Searchable Archives With Friendly Web Interface at http://marc.free.net.ph To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
