Ian C. Sison wrote:
Will this mean that ReiserFS 3.5 users would need an mkfs for them to migrate on the stabler 3.6 line, once they've upgraded the kernel and the appropriate reiserfsprogs? Or is there a painless alternative?the on disk format of reiser 3.6 is different in the sense that it allows NFS to be stably run over reiser filesystem. THere where numerous issues with reiser 3.5 and NFS in the past, which was addressed by 3.6 on disk format.
--
Paolo Alexis Falcone
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fully Searchable Archives With Friendly Web Interface at http://marc.free.net.ph
To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
