----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark M. Barrios" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 2:44 PM Subject: Re: [plug] squid cache
> >>setting the cache_dir to something small doesnt solve the > >>problem, > >> > >> > > > >huh???? it will not solve the disk full problem??? > > > > > yes saying yes without backup support is useless... > i forgot the exact message but it would something about the cache_dir > size being over 100% or something about the disk being full/not enough > disk space and squid dying simply because you got a misconfigured squid... > ive never encountered or heard of problems on UFS concerning fragmentation. there are no known fragmentation problem on UFS on the application layer but what im saying here is that setting half of the entire disk space will improve the fragmentation problem *algorithm* done on the kernel layer especially on the filesystem module... > and by 'ineffective' i meant a cache that doesnt do much to help > conserve bandwidth because popular objects are evicted even before they > get a HIT. are we talking here about disk full problem or conserving bandwidth? conserving bandwidth is another topic... > >GDFS, LFUDA or LRU replacement policy.... squid always stayed within its > >limits... > > > > > > in my personal humble experience, that was not the case. in my experienced too ... i never see like that.... what im suspecting with your case is that you got a misconfigured squid... fooler. _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Searchable Archives With Friendly Web Interface at http://marc.free.net.ph To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
