Orly wrote:
>> dido at imperium.ph wrote: >> >> Have you tried looking at an actual SOAP message? Text-based it >> may be, but it's about as human-readable as the crud that MS >> Word's HTML exporter produces.
> No, I find it *quite* human-readable. > MS .NET produces nicer-looking SOAP envelopes than SOAP::Lite, in > fact.
>> And in that case, if a person can't easily parse it >> visually, then what advantage does it give to offset the major >> disadvantages like up to an order of magnitude more bandwidth >> consumption?
> Well I *can* parse it visually. And WSDL is really great. Too bad > SOAP::Lite isn't THAT smart when it comes to consuming services > based on their WSDL alone..
Long term usage of Perl apparently gives you superhuman powers in the visual parsing department. :-D :-D :-D
-- reply-to: a n d y @ n e t f x p h . c o m -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
