The routes are fine, you don't need to set a route at all. Show us the result of "ip a".
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 4:17 PM Rich Shepard <rshep...@appl-ecosys.com> wrote: > On Sat, 7 Dec 2019, Russell Senior wrote: > > > By easy I just meant that there are no obstacles. Just "ip addr add" > twice. > > I had seen that but hadn't tried it until now. The Dell is now on two > subnets and neither can communicate with the router: > > [root@lemna ~]# ip addr add 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 > [root@lemna ~]# ip add show eth0 > 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP > group default qlen 1000 > link/ether b8:ac:6f:69:63:ca brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 192.168.55.3/24 brd 192.168.55.255 scope global eth0 > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > inet 192.168.1.0/24 scope global eth0 > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > inet6 fe80::baac:6fff:fe69:63ca/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > # ping 192.168.1.1 > PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. > From 192.168.1.0 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable > From 192.168.1.0 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable > From 192.168.1.0 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable > From 192.168.1.0 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable > ^C > --- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics --- > 7 packets transmitted, 0 received, +4 errors, 100% packet loss, time 6000ms > pipe 4 > [root@lemna ~]# ping 192.168.55.4 > PING 192.168.55.4 (192.168.55.4) 56(84) bytes of data. > From 192.168.55.3 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable > From 192.168.55.3 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable > From 192.168.55.3 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable > From 192.168.55.3 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable > > --- 192.168.55.4 ping statistics --- > 7 packets transmitted, 0 received, +4 errors, 100% packet loss, time 6000ms > pipe 4 > [root@lemna ~]# ip r > default via 192.168.55.4 dev eth0 metric 1 > 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link > 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.0 > 192.168.55.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.55.3 > > Does it matter that the second subnet is 192.168.1.0/24 rather than > 192.168.1.55/24? > > Rich > _______________________________________________ > PLUG mailing list > PLUG@pdxlinux.org > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list PLUG@pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug