The paper includes this line: "IRB [...] determined this is not human research. We obtained a formal IRB-exempt letter"
IRB stands for Institutional Review Board and any research institution is going to have one. Here's the wikipedia page about IRBs in general: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institutional_review_board On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 5:06 PM Jason Barbier <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021, at 5:02 PM, Denis Heidtmann wrote: > > PSU has a policy that requires admin. review of any experiments to be > > conducted on humans. That got some people in trouble for testing > > publications' response to submitted articles using bogus stuff. I wonder > > if the UNM has such a requirement, and, if so, I wonder if it was followed. > > > > -Denis > > The answer is yes, and they have an ethics review board which was posted on > that email thread for GKH to toss an email to and let them know whats up. > > > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 8:31 AM Ben Koenig <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021, 7:32 AM Ben Koenig <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021, 7:19 AM Jason Barbier <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021, at 7:02 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > > > >> > On Wed, 21 Apr 2021, Russell Senior wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/yh%2ffm%[email protected]/ > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > https://github.com/QiushiWu/QiushiWu.github.io/blob/main/papers/OpenSourceInsecurity.pdf > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Holy crap, way to step on it with golf shoes! > > > >> > > > > >> > I wonder if anyone has ever written anything on the subject of > > > >> > Patterns of Abuse and Criminality. This looks like a version of > > > >> > gaslighting, but in a tech-community context. > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > Paul Heinlein > > > >> > [email protected] <mailto:heinlein%40madboa.com> > > > >> > 45.38° N, 122.59° W > > > >> > _______________________________________________ > > > >> > PLUG: https://pdxlinux.org > > > >> > PLUG mailing list > > > >> > [email protected] <mailto:PLUG%40pdxlinux.org> > > > >> > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> To be fair reading the whole response from the umn address it reads > > > >> more > > > >> like "Fuuuuuuuuuuu, the subject caught me and is blowing up my doctoral > > > >> thesis how do I save it! > > > > > > > > > > > > By accepting the test results for what they are? > > > > > > > > He set out to prove a theory that OSS is inherently insecure. He tested > > > > that theory. > > > > > > > > Test results came back negative. The OSS community protected itself from > > > > malicious actors. > > > > > > > > > > > Heyyy the pdf works when downloaded and viewed directly! > > > > > > But I still have trouble reading it. Maybe the CS team at UMN should have > > > a > > > language arts major clean up the grammar before they start recommending > > > changes to the linux coc. > > > > > > > > > It IS a serious college project after all. > > > -Ben > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > >> PLUG: https://pdxlinux.org > > > >> PLUG mailing list > > > >> [email protected] > > > >> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plugi > > > >> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > PLUG: https://pdxlinux.org > > > PLUG mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > PLUG: https://pdxlinux.org > > PLUG mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > > > _______________________________________________ > PLUG: https://pdxlinux.org > PLUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug _______________________________________________ PLUG: https://pdxlinux.org PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
