‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Sunday, June 27th, 2021 at 7:25 AM, Tomas Kuchta <tomas.kuchta.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Many of your answers are too elaborate to be comprehended by average human. > Especially those of us with strongly developed selective hearing/reading > skills. Relax. I was referencing a science fiction novel in response to the fact that Richard appeared to get my reference. The message wasn't even intended for you in the first place. > See if you can focus longer: > https://phys.org/news/2015-05-technology-attention-span-shorter-goldfish.html > > The point is the question and the answer should fit these realities. > If the do not, than one is probably wasting time asking or answering. > > Tomas I will restate my original point in plain english. The initial email in this thread is not well formed. The user *appears* to be asking a question, but does so in a way that makes it difficult for us to understand exactly what he wants to know. This results in people providing answers to different questions. Make sense? -Ben
