does the original poster want
* to look things up in the archives
* figure out how to make such a thing
If the second, how deep does he want to go?
---
Michael Rasmussen, Portland Oregon
Be Appropriate && Follow Your Curiosity
On 2021-09-23 23:51, Tomas Kuchta wrote:
+2 for google:
a) no additional traffic to the mailing list. This could be
significant
for trivial search engines.
b) speed - google responds in miliseconds
c) google's NLP is state of the art. No way <1k people team effort
could
come close to what you get for free.
Just my 2c, -T
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021, 13:40 Russell Senior <[email protected]>
wrote:
This sounds vaguely like a homework assignment.
My advice would be to think about what information you'd need to have
to be able to do the things you are describing, and then think about
how to get that information.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 8:25 AM Daniel Ortiz
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
> May anyone please lead me in making a small search engine for this
mailing
> list's archives and another one? All it needs to do is return the links
> that contains the words you put in regardless of space, order, location,
or
> capitalization. The words also don't have to be all in there. Don't
concern
> yourselves as much with the ranking system since that is secondary and
> could be left out, but a ranking system that has ranking from the
greatest
> percentage to lowest percentage of words then in the search and ranking
> from the first to the last word in the search (an example of that in
action
> is if the search has "programming FORTRAN" then it places first the links
> with both words then the links with the first word then the link with the
> last word) would make it more useful.
> From, Daniel Ortiz
