> Sounds like you were using Apache 1.3. Performance varies depending on > the use case. Apache in the past has been slower than IIS at serving > static content. Apache 2.0 is much better in this regard. Even still, > though, if performance is paramount, you need to use the Tux web server > to serve static content such as images, and then use apache to handle > the dynamic stuff.
Well, we were using Apache 2.0 internally for testing, but the airline doing the specific tests I was referring to may have been on 1.3. I honestly don't remember. Greg /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
