Michael L Torrie wrote: > Well given that "modern" languages are really just a return to the > theories worked out in the 60s (LISP really has everything that modern > languages have and more)
I guess you threw in that flamebait for fun. :-) But I'm not looking for flamebait. In all honesty, I'd like to know more about the "and more" part of your LISP statement. What am I missing by not using LISP? I don't mean some random feature like pretty-printing numbers. What deep philosophy is in LISP that other languages have yet to discover? Shane /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
