On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:20:45PM -0600, Michael L Torrie wrote: > On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 12:12 -0600, Michael L Torrie wrote: > > Charles, your comments were and are unnecessarily rude and don't cast > > you in a very good light. UUG has been posting meeting announcements on > > PLUG for years and never has had anyone reacted the way you have. > > Actually the person who started this whole flame war was not Charles, if > I recall correctly. Sorry to intimate that.
Thank you for the correction. No apology necessary. > > > If > > you really were honestly interested in the meeting (it appears that you > > are not, but rather just trying to be difficult), you, or the original > > complainer, could have posted a simple polite message asking for the > > details and asking that in the future more specific directions be > > included with each posting. Actually, what I had hoped to do was to suggest specific things a meeting announcement could include to maximise attendance and minimise requests for more information. You are correct, I could have framed the suggestions more politely. Following on Stuart's mock-whinging message and style was a mistake. -- Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
pgpBJ4q34Vsbr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
