On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 20:07 -0700, Charles Curley wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 03:53:17PM -0500, Grant Shipley wrote: > > "...that will allow open-source Linux software to work with the > > company's Windows software" > > > > Exactly what does this mean? > > Don't know that I can answer that, but folks might want to read the > groklaw analysis. http://groklaw.net/
This choice quote from groklaw is pretty interesting: Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said his company is open to talking to other Linux distributors about reaching mutual patent coverage deals similar to the agreement signed Nov. 2 with Novell. Such talks would be a good idea, Ballmer suggested, since now only Novell's SUSE Linux customers are the only Linux vendors that have any assurance that Microsoft won't sue for patent infringement.... The distributors of other versions of Linux cannot assure their customers that Microsoft won't sue for patent infringement. "If a customer says, 'Look, do we have liability for the use of your patented work?' Essentially, If you're using non-SUSE Linux, then I'd say the answer is yes," Ballmer said. "I suspect that [customers] will take that issue up with their distributor," Ballmer said. Or if customers are considering doing a direct download of a non-SUSE Linux version, "they'll think twice about that," he said. Does this sound familiar? Can anyone say "SCO?" Micahel > > /* > PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net > Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug > Don't fear the penguin. > */ /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
