On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 14:30:36 -0700, "Daniel C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On 11/8/06, Roberto Mello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Like what? > > Just list everything Postgres has that MySQL doesn't and there's your > answer. > > > I agree with Jonathan. PostgreSQL is easier to setup and maintain, just as > > easy to use, and very well supported, although not as many off-the-street > > hosting options. > > I don't think it's as easy to use when you're first learning. That's > like saying that vi is as easy to use as pico. Once you know what > you're doing, sure, it's even easier, but when you're learning, pico > is much easier.
Not really; vi's obtuse interface has a learning cliff, not a curve. A better analogy would be, would you rather have a nailgun, a circular saw, and a drill, or just a claw hammer? :) -Jonathan -- C++ is history repeated as tragedy. Java is history repeated as farce. --Scott McKay /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
