On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 14:43 -0600, Wade Preston Shearer wrote: > > FC 3 is not supported by RedHat in any way and security updates are > > not > > being produced. I'm not sure of the state of the fedoralegacy.org > > site > > anymore, so you're running at your own risk. However CentOS 4 is > > binary > > and rpm compatible with FC3, so if I were you, I'd just add CentOS > > sources to your yum and carefully dist-upgrade to CentOS 4. Custom > > software you have installed won't notice any differences between > > CentOS > > 4 and FC3, and you'll the added benefit of active security updates for > > the next couple of years. > > What is the difference between FC and CentOS?
FC 3 because RHEL 4. (provided the base packages) CentOS 4 is a recompile of RHEL4. It's binary compatible with FC3 in the important ways: Glibc version, RPM version, Kernel version, all library versions (ssl, etc), and C++ ABI. Michael > > /* > PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net > Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug > Don't fear the penguin. > */ /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
