On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 02:42:16PM -0600, Kenneth Burgener wrote: > Stuart Jansen wrote: > >> Curious, why is NIS+ a poor choice? > >> > >> [1]http://www.faqs.org/docs/linux_network/x-087-2-nis.nisplus.html > > > > You didn't read far enough. > > > > "At the time we're writing, there isn't yet a good working > > implementation of NIS+ for Linux, so it isn't covered here."[1] > > > Doh!
I did not find an obvious date for that document, but in its collection of Linux distributions it lists Caldera and Corel, but not Fedora or Ubuntu. I suspect it's a bit out of date. Tke latest version at the Linux Documentation Project (http://www.tldp.org/guides.html) is dated March 2000. Stuart, is that "read[ing] far enough"? -- Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
pgpORS5lWTtAc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
