On 11/15/07, Hans Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In my case, I'm trying to decide whether to abandon darcs for > mercurial (hg) or hold out hope that one day darcs will get over the > exponential merge problem. Right now I sit on the fence. I use hg > sometimes and darcs other times. I'm quite happy with both tools, and > both have their pros and cons. The thing that makes me most uneasy about > darcs (aside from the occasional exponential merge problem) is that it's > inconvenient to do "point in time" checkouts, branches, etc. The thing > that makes me uneasy about hg (or indeed most other DRCS's, to my > understanding of them) is the lack of cherry picking. But thinking back > on it I haven't ever truly used it in darcs either.
Well, if that's all that's keeping you from hg, http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/RecordExtension http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/TransplantExtension I haven't actually ever wanted to use it either, though. :) -Jonathan /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
