On Feb 6, 2008 6:52 PM, Corey Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 14:40 -0700, Andrew Jorgensen wrote: > > This bill does no such thing. Go read the text. I'm not in favor of > > the bill but you should all know that it applies only to access points > > operated by businesses > > The bill states > > A person may not provide wireless Internet access to the public > unless the person restricts access to prevent a minor from > accessing material harmful to minors. > > Specifically excluded are home which are providing wifi for "personal > wireless Internet access", but if you offer any sort of wifi for public > consumption, whether you are a business, a library, or Joe > Philanthropist, you would be subject to the requirements. >
So If I put up a page that they have to agree to that says, If you are a minor you can use it. And they have to click ok, does that count as restricting access? Nathan /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
