> > Thus making it too expensive to use for industrial uses. Eliminating > > an entire class of goods. > > And what's wrong with that? If something is too expensive to be used for > one type of use, then it won't be used for that particular use. So what? > How does that strengthen the argument against using a commodity like > gold as money? Or more to the point, if that class of goods really was that important then people would pay the price for it.
Von Fugal -- Government is a disease that masquerades as its own cure -- Robert Lefevre
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
