On 7/20/2010 9:42 PM, Stuart Jansen wrote: > On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 21:35 -0600, Michael Torrie wrote: > >> Course if everyone used the GPL there'd be no problem. :) >> > By that logic, the DBADL is also a viable option. > > http://philsturgeon.co.uk/code/dbad-license > > > I wrote this license once, and have some code under it. I like it better than the GPL. YMMV (It's essentially the WTF license, but more professional, no swearing). It works for art and other content as well!
-Tod Hansmann Any entity is permitted to copy, redistribute, or modify the accompanying work for any reason whatsoever with no conditions except the condition below and under any new license. "Do what you want, but don't blame me." THIS WORK IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR(S) 'AS IS' AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR(S) BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS WORK, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
