On 05/26/2011 08:50 AM, Jason Van Patten wrote: > My thinking is that the value of a thought is not in its presentation > but in its perception. Stuart doesn't want to see any side but his own > and so he limits his perceptional capacity to that singular vantage > point.
Given this exchange, I'd more characterize your point of view this way than Stuart's. I guess e-mail limits your perception somewhat, but Stuart's world view, and willingness to accept other points of view, is much broader than most people. He will, however, never let you have a free pass. He will challenge you on your views, as well as the relevancy of your comments. In this case your comments were non-sequitur, or at least a logical fallacy, and he called you on it. > While that is his choice i see no point in changing it against > his will. When he wants to learn the truth he will listen in the mean > time i'm sure everyone have fun watching him pursue his aspirations of > megalomania at the expense of anyone he feels like targeting. Oh wow. That's almost funny. That's like saying, "I know you are but what am I" on the school playground. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
