It seems like ANT+ and Bluetooth LE are the weapon of choice for the sensor kids these days, but I don't have any personal experience with any of 'em :)
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Jim Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > > Not sure about Bluetooth performance in terms of latency. We are measuring > small movements in real time. > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 7, 2013, at 5:18 PM, "Lonnie Olson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Jim Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I normally post positions on PLUG but this time I have a question. I > am involved with a small company and I have a product that needs to be > wireless. I'm looking for a solution pertaining to wireless USB > communication. I have a device that uses a normal USB 2.0 cable to > communicate between a sensor of human vertical sway movement (done with > accelerometer and/or gyroscope) and a piece of software. I need a way to > eliminate the cable in an effort to track more dynamic human movements. I > prefer for the software to not know the difference between the current > wired configuration and an eventual wireless option. Is there an off the > shelf product that could handle that? > > > > Sounds like a perfect application for Bluetooth. > > > > /* > > PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net > > Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug > > Don't fear the penguin. > > */ > > /* > PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net > Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug > Don't fear the penguin. > */ > -- http://justinhileman.com /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
