Just curious, but why not use nfs for this instead? I'm pretty sure it's well supported on all platforms that you've mentioned.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Michael Torrie <torr...@gmail.com> wrote: > As many of you probably know, OS X Mavericks uses a home-grown smb > server for doing file sharing with other computers, instead of Samba. > In the long run, Apple is going to use smb2 for inter-Mac communication > as well as interoperability with other OS's. > > Unfortunately, I'm now not able to connect to SMB shares on Mavericks > from my linux machine. My old creaky Fedora 14 install certainly won't > talk to it (Samba 3), but Fedora 19 will, but only with smbclient, or > gvfs via nautilus or nemo. Trying to do an actual kernel mount fails, > usually with "mount error(95): Operation not supported." This is with > Kernel 3.10. smbclient works fine and I can browse the files. This is > with Samba4. I think there's some options to pass to mount that might > make this work, but I don't know what they are. Apparently Apple's smbd > does not like it when Linux tries to negotiate for unix file permissions > on the protocol. I've tried passing nounix,ntlmssp as options as > someone suggested, but no dice. As a last resort, I will install Samba > on OS X (http://eduo.info/apps/smbup) > > Anyone got this to work? Alternatively, is there anyway to configure > Apple's smbX daemon to support SMB1? > > /* > PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net > Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug > Don't fear the penguin. > */ > /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
