fine we will make it 10 :)
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Charles Curley < [email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:58:43 -0700 > Joshua Marsh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Can I ask why it must be numeric? From a security perspective, a 9+ > > digit pin seems a bit odd. Traditionally, PINs are short so they can > > be easy to remember. Having a 10 digit number seems like it defeats > > that purpose. Going with 9+ digits seems like an attempt to be more > > security conscious but allowing only digits greatly reduces the > > domain of passwords. I may be missing something, so I'm really > > interested in the use case. > > Hmmm, 9 characters, digits only, and easy to remember? I know, I'll use > my SSN. > > *FAIL* > > -- > > The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, > and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be > violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, > supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the > place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. > -- U.S. Const. Amendment IV > > Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB > > /* > PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net > Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug > Don't fear the penguin. > */ > /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
