frankd wrote: > Here my experience also in line with CParker: > 1) Do not reuse a database you have created with a newer windows version > on your raspberry pi with an older version of the program on the pi (we > have only 1.8 there). > 2) Best is that you let your pi create its own database version (which > you can edit later with the 1.8 windows version), do not copy your > database to the pi > 3) Make sure that your windows MusicIP really embeds the fingerprints > into all MP3s, I had sometimes hiccups in the past. Easy to check with > MP3Tag as Slartibartfast already proposed > 4) Once you are sure that your pi has access to the files with embedded > MusicIP tags, let your raspberry pi create a new database and scan all > files again. As long as the files contain your MusicIP fingerprints this > should be pretty fast. > 5) Once you have a Pi created database, you can edit it with the 1.8 > version of MusicIP on Windows, adding filters and more.... but make a > backup before... > Cheers, > Frank
Thank you for this information. I am considering getting a Pi primarily to serve as my MusicIP server. Right now MusicIP 1.9 is my Windows laptop. But the laptop is not on 24/7, and when it's not reachable Sugarcube naturally starts using random tracks. A small Pi would solve that problem. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ prabbit's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11142 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106958 _______________________________________________ plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
