mherger wrote: > > Ok, new server log uploaded. BTW, I think I made the code changes > > without the smiley face emoji's :). > > That's why the logs are so boring to read, I guess! :D Argh... automagic > > sometimes is stupid. And as I post using the mailing list I usually > don't even get to see all the fancy stuff. > > But we're digressing. Thanks for the latest log. It confirmed that we do > > get the higher res information in that request: > > [21-02-11 15:35:30.4753] Plugins::Qobuz::API::__ANON__ (719) { > bit_depth => 24, > duration => 358, > format_id => 7, > mime_type => "audio/flac", > sampling_rate => 96, > track_id => 96_100_260, > > That's what Qobuz is telling me it was sending. Whether that's the case > > for the actual stream or not, I can't say. I trust that information and > > show it. > > Now I only have to figure out why there would be a second entry with the > > lower (CD quality only) values.
Thats interesting, because the tech info for the playing track, that shows the bitrate/sample-rate, has never shown 96khz for Qobuz streams. Its seems to always show 44.1khz for me (I only have SB Radios). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ rootee's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=70728 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=113910
_______________________________________________ plugins mailing list plugins@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins