mherger wrote:
> > Ok, new server log uploaded. BTW, I think I made the code changes
> > without the smiley face emoji's :).
>
> That's why the logs are so boring to read, I guess! :D Argh... automagic
>
> sometimes is stupid. And as I post using the mailing list I usually
> don't even get to see all the fancy stuff.
>
> But we're digressing. Thanks for the latest log. It confirmed that we do
>
> get the higher res information in that request:
>
> [21-02-11 15:35:30.4753] Plugins::Qobuz::API::__ANON__ (719) {
> bit_depth => 24,
> duration => 358,
> format_id => 7,
> mime_type => "audio/flac",
> sampling_rate => 96,
> track_id => 96_100_260,
>
> That's what Qobuz is telling me it was sending. Whether that's the case
>
> for the actual stream or not, I can't say. I trust that information and
>
> show it.
>
> Now I only have to figure out why there would be a second entry with the
>
> lower (CD quality only) values.
Thats interesting, because the tech info for the playing track, that
shows the bitrate/sample-rate, has never shown 96khz for Qobuz streams.
Its seems to always show 44.1khz for me (I only have SB Radios).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rootee's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=70728
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=113910
_______________________________________________
plugins mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
