bpa;487880 Wrote: > It is interesting to note the AACplus at 48k has a higher CPU load than > 128k AAC. It looks like the psychoacoustic additions of AACplus are > processor intensive. I had assumed the slower speed link would be less > of a system load than a higher speed link.
Both streams work fine in (the development version of) SSOTS using the Bin/arm-linux/faad shipped with SBS 7.4.1. faad calls itself a "floating point version". I see higher CPU load (50% or so) with 48k-aac+-stream compared to the 128k-aac-stream (25% or so). This is on a TS-219 (it says 1200 BohoMIPS in /proc/cpuinfo). -- flipflip Check out flipflip's 'Squeezebox Server On DiskStation (SSODS) and on TurboStations (SSOTS)' (http://oinkzwurgl.org/ssods/)! Please do NOT file SSODS bugs in (SD's) bugzilla. Use the forums. And only the forums. Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ flipflip's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5223 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=70812 _______________________________________________ plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
