On 10/4/05, Elliot Metsger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David H. DeWolf wrote:
> Anyone have any ideas why the
> retag fails with the error:
>
> Error: Source and dest appear not to be in the same repository (src: '
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/portals/pluto/trunk'; dst: '
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/portals/pluto/tags/release-1.0.1')
https in the src url and http in the dst url. They both need to be the
same protocol at least for my version (svn, version 1.2.3 (r15833)).
> Also, is this the wrong approach? Now that we're past the rc stages should
> we just be cutting new builds and voting on their quality? In such an
> approach, theoretically 1.0.1 would be considered a failed build and
> 1.0.2would be cut and voted on as Alpha, Beta, or GA?
1.0.1 has never been offically released right? So my (advisory) vote
would be to keep the 1.0.1 version. If/had it been offically released
I'd vote for a 1.0.2.
My 0.02!
Elliot
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
> On 9/28/05, David H. DeWolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I probably won't have time to recut for a couple of days. . .sorry.
>>Anyone can feel free to take over if they have the time.
>>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>>The ConfigServices.properties file contained a value for
>>>portaldriver.info <http://portaldriver.info> as
>>
>>pluto-driver/1.0.1-SNAPSHOT, which caused the
>>
>>>version name in the Pluto portal to include the SNAPSHOT token. I fixed
>>>the file in SVN's trunk (portaldriver.info=pluto-driver/1.0.1) and
>>>checked it in. David said he will cut a new release with this change.
>>>/Craig
>>>----------------------------------------------------
>>>Craig Doremus
>>>Senior J2EE Application Developer
>>>Hannaford Bros
>>>207-885-2014
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>----------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>*"David H. DeWolf" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>*
>>>
>>>09/24/2005 02:24 PM
>>>Please respond to
>>>[email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>To
>>>[email protected]
>>>cc
>>>Portals PMC < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Subject
>>>[VOTE] Pluto 1.0.1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>The test distributions of pluto 1.0.1 have been available for a few days
>>>now. Once you have completed testing, please vote on whether or not
>>>these should be signed and distributed as our first general availability
>>>release - 1.0.1.
>>>
>>>http://cvs.apache.org/dist/portals/pluto/v1.0.1/
>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>David
>>>
>>>David H. DeWolf wrote:
>>>
>>>>1.0.1 test builds are available at:
>>>>
>>>> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/portals/pluto/v1.0.1/
>>>>
>>>>Please begin to test. I will send out the vote within the next few
>>>>days. I have also deployed these test builds to the maven repo on
>>>>cvs.apache.org <http://cvs.apache.org> in order to encourage testing
>>
>>by those embedding pluto
>>
>>>>and utilizing maven.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
