Yes.

The original issue was that action test (in the testsuite) were not
working. Once I dove into it, I discovered the same thing that you
mentioned - - It's not really an action parameter problem - it's a
session problem with action requests. Now I understand why we were
talking past each other. . .and there was some confusion on my part. .
.

I've been working on this all day and it's driving must nuts.  I can't
figure out why the cross context dispatch is behaving differently
between a render and action request.  The only thing I can think is
that we're caching a previously retrieved HttpSession from the
original context within one of the HttpServletRequest wrappers and
using it later on. . .but I can't find that behavior anywhere.

I guess the other possibility is that it's a tomcat bug, but I can't
duplicate the problem with a simple test case outside of pluto - so
I'm guessing it's really a pluto issue.

If anyone else has any ideas, let me know.

David

On 11/18/05, LaCasse, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David,
>
> When you say Action parameters do mean that the session available from
> processAction method isn't the same as that from render method? The
> problem that I'm having and I believe has been mentioned by Zhong is for
> example: if you set a session attribute in render() and then try and
> access it in processAction() it won't be there.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David H. DeWolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 7:24 PM
> To: Pluto Developer List
> Subject: 1.1: Release Early, Release Often
>
> I'm curious what others thoughts are about releasing an alpha version of
>
> 1.1 in the next week or so.  What are the items we want to make sure we
> get taken care of before we roll our first 1.1 distribution?
>
> A couple of Definates:
> 1) Action Parameters
> 2) Portlet Preferences via derby
> 3) Fix assemble and deploy plugins (reports that they are broken?)
> 4) Build distributions via m2 (obviously)
>
> What else?
>
> I don't see any other reasons to postpone an alpha release. . . do you?
>
>
>
> David
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to