Torsten Dettborn wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David H. DeWolf schrieb:
I think the important part is not necessarily the committing,
thats a good point David, the problem is, that you and Craig are the
only one who wrote comments and helped us. Months ago there are so many
people, who wants to know what we are doing, but nobody of them wrote a
comment, we discussed the patch three or four weeks ago, nobody else
made a commen if its good or bad or how we can make it better. That
makes me sadly.
I understand your frustration. At the same time, I encourage you to
continue to be active on this list. The development list is a HUGE part
of the open source community, and you will only help your cause by
having these types of discussions as well as airing design decisions on
this list. That type of consistent communication will get you a long
way - not only in getting attention from Craig, Myself, and others, but
also in obtaining commit credentials.
I encourage you to read:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html
http://struts.apache.org/helping.html
These are great resource for understanding the asf.
I would also recommend that your group begin to collaborate about pluto
exclusively on the mailing lists - even when the communication is only
amongst yourselves. This will provide INVALUABLE insight into how
things are working, design decisions, etc. . .AND it will show that you
are a critical part of our community. Becoming a committer is as much
(if not more) about community involvement as it is about code.
I hope that helps,
David
but the
reviewing of the patch prior to commitment. This is a critical part as
we need to make sure that pluto's developers have an understanding of
the code base that's being donated.
Torsten Dettborn wrote:
Hello all,
please can anybody else than David commit the patch, it's very important
for our work. It is hard work for us to handle all patches. Maybe we
all could benefit, if i can commit our patches myself. Please write me
comments if we have made anything wrong and how we can make it better.
Best regards
Torsten
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF51EX0Ji0BqEIlIURAmZWAJ48njxGZRE2SlDNV4So/9eZS2X8SQCeNICI
VoMcTSidgKHKoCp5fhFcCog=
=sBy7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
