I will say it is actually (or at least for us was) easier than we expected to get everything working under pluto 1.1 as the integration points are much more well defined and the amount of pluto related code needed to write is fairly small.
Not sure how much help that is going to be but I will also say that the effort is worth it. We ended up being able to remove a significant amount of code by upgrading and simplify much of our framework.
-Eric Dalquist David H. DeWolf wrote:
Jason Dillon wrote:Is there a guide for how to upgrade a system from Pluto 1.0.x to 1.1?Unfortunately no. 1.1 and 1.0 are so different in terms of integration, I think it would be worth simply starting over. A guide would be great, but would take quite a few cycles. If anyone wants to take notes as they do it, I would commit the guide to documentation.You're best reference so far may be uPortal. I helped them get through the upgrade and they hang around this list. I'll bet Eric may pop in with a few notes.And really... is there anyone on your team that might be interested in helping Apache Geronimo upgrade to the latest Pluto 1.1 release for our console? The idea has been tossed around for a while our dev lists, but so far no one has had time to look into this more. Any one here have some free cycles to help us out?There was talk a while back that you were going to use jetspeed instead so that you had a portal provided out of the box. Have you moved past this idea?Also, how much customization is actually made in Geronimo? If I remember correctly, don't you actually use the portal driver as a whole?David--jason
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
