David H. DeWolf wrpte: > Everything is already mirrored, we should only need to update for the > future. My understanding is that we can't modify releases that have > already been published - and frankly, I REALLY don't want to go down > that path. > Yepp, I think we should push a new release out as soon as possible.
Carsten > Elliot Metsger wrote: >> So I got pinged again by the repository folks, this time Daniel Kulp. >> >> None of our maven artifacts have a LICENSE or NOTICE file in them, and >> apparently this is also required per >> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html: >> >>> Does the policy apply to binary/object files, such as executables or >>> JAR files? >>> >>> Yes. Even if there are no source files within the release, the >>> LICENSE file and NOTICE file are still both required within every ASF >>> distribution -- whether the unit of distribution is a .jar, .msi, >>> .tar/.?gz, .zip, .exe installer, or any other file format used for >>> distributions. For example, Windows .exe files must not be used as a >>> unit of distribution unless they are installers and include the >>> LICENSE and NOTICE files in their installation. >> This is in Jira as PLUTO-349. >> >> I'm not sure where this leaves us with our existing releases. >> >> Elliot >> > -- Carsten Ziegeler http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
