Ok,
I have some time. What is the game plan for moving forward?
There are three open issues, one of which has a patch (PLUTO-308 -
Jaxb). There are a number of resolved or closed issues.
What is being suggested?
1) Review/implement the remaining issues?
2) Do we review the changes in the already closed issues?
Once that is done - tests pass, etc, promote the branch to trunk?
Elliot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
Yes, the Univ of Jena group has not done a good job in communicating their
design decisions to the mailing list. But we should also admit that we
have dropped the ball in our code review and helping them do the commits.
I am particularly disappointed in the people who complained loudly about
the process when we initially discussed it, but seemed to have disappeared
thereafter.
I too would like to see Pluto 2.0 move forward, but do not have a lot of
time to devote to it now. Perhaps we will get more activity when our
container users see a stable JSR-286 spec and decide that it is time for
them to move toward supporting it.
/Craig
"David H. DeWolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
05/16/2007 09:12 AM
Please respond to
[email protected]
To
[email protected]
cc
Subject
Re: When will the pluto 2.0 branch start?
Stefan,
I'd like to see it sooner rather than later, but unfortunately there
just hasn't been much activity around it. I personally don't have the
time right now to review all of the progress and make sure that the
community has the proper oversight. I have been looking at things as
they come in and and things look like they are moving in a solid
direction. I would have no problem if (and would actually encourage)
another committer wanted to help drive the process towards 2.0.
I know I sound like a broken record, but I really think that discussions
on this list about the design choices and progress being made would
really help to peak interest and provide some avenues for oversight.
There was a bit of it about jaxb which I thought was very healthy and
resulted in several people chiming in, however, not other aspect of the
implementation has been addressed.
What do others think?
David
Stefan Hepper wrote:
Guys,
the University of Jena will soon have finished implementing the current
draft of JSR 286.
Until now there was no feedback on the design or implemention.
Are you just waiting until everything is complete and than dump it into
a 2.0 branch or what is the current plan?
Stefan
