361 However, I see you have sorted it :-)
On 7/18/07, Ajay Panagariya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for that tip.I believe you're talking about Pluto-247? On 7/18/07, Marc Veary <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > There was a patch added to URL parser, I'm not sure if this has had > impact on this. I'll have a look. > > Kind regards, > -- > Marc > > On 7/17/07, Ajay Panagariya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I've got a problem when I try to pass parameters that are formatted as > > URI's. > > > > Some URI's are of the form > > > > (a) http://www.example.com/test?item=pluto.apache.com > > > > others are of the form > > > > (b) http://www.example.com/test?item=pluto.apache.com/wiki?id=1234 > > > > In (b), the special characters get encoded as %F3's, etc. When it gets > > to processAction method in the portlet, the URI of concern (the 'item' > > parameter in this case) looks fine. By this parameters gets to the doView, > > I've lost everything after the '?'. > > > > As it stands, I'm using URI.getPath() and URI.getQuery(), and passing > > each half seperately, but this solution really doesn't lend itself to > > flexibility. I can't figure out what the problem is or why the URI isn't > > passed properly. This portlet code has worked in previous version of Pluto, > > but in the current 1.2 it does not seem to work as expected. Can > > anyone shed some light onto a possible solution, or maybe what I might be > > doing wrong? Has anyone encountered this before? > > > > I am trying to port some portlets (no pun intended) to Pluto 1.2, but > > my solution of URI.getPath() and URI.getQuery() seems to look worse > > and worse idea with each portlet I need to repair. > > > > I know a lot happens between processAction and doView, and I've tried > > stepping through it, but I can't seem to pinpoint where my URI is getting > > chopped in half. > > > > -Ajay Panagariya > > > >
