On Jun 23, 2009, at 11:26 PM, Jin Yao wrote:
Hello,
I am working for a product which is an enterprise level
application, We are thinking to develop a portal with our own
features using open portal portlet container. I have some question
on the portlet container
Is there any license issue with using open portal portlet container
for commercial use
IANAL.... I would say no. For instance IBM includes pluto in the
commercial product WAS CE (based on apache geronimo which also
includes pluto). You should consult the apache software license 2.0
and draw your own conclusions.
Is there any performance issue with open portal portlet container
Performance always depends on what you are trying to do. With
appropriate benchmarketing you can make any product look good or bad.
If our portal is JSR-168 compliant, which one is better: using
Pluto 2 or Pluto 1.*
Unless you are setting up an extremely simple portal that requires
source code configuration changes to modify and has no user-modifiable
features, you almost certainly want jetspeed rather than pluto.
If you are just starting with your portal I think you will want to use
portlet 2.0 features. I wish we had had them when starting the
geronimo admin console portlet application.
thanks
david jencks
Thanks in advance
BR//Jin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This communication is confidential and intended solely for the
addressee(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited. If you believe this message has been
sent to you in error, please notify the sender by replying to this
transmission and delete the message without disclosing it. Thank you.
E-mail including attachments is susceptible to data corruption,
interruption, unauthorized amendment, tampering and viruses, and we
only send and receive e-mails on the basis that we are not liable
for any such corruption, interception, amendment, tampering or
viruses or any consequences thereof.
