Woonsan Ko wrote: > > So, I'm inclined to support that case as well because it is mentioned as *not > required*. > Great, so +1 to the whole thing.
Regards Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [email protected]
- How about allowing empty namespaced portlet descriptor? Woonsan Ko
- Re: How about allowing empty namespaced portlet desc... Carsten Ziegeler
- Re: How about allowing empty namespaced portlet ... Woonsan Ko
- Re: How about allowing empty namespaced port... Ate Douma
- Re: How about allowing empty namespaced port... Carsten Ziegeler
