+1 for release.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 9:08 PM Neil Griffin <neil.grif...@portletfaces.org> wrote: > > Dear Apache Portals Pluto Team and community, > > I've staged a release candidate for the new Apache Portals Pluto 3.1.1 > release. > > This release candidate includes: > > * Fully compliant Reference Implementation of the new Portlet 3.0 > Specification per JCR-362 > https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=362 > * Fully completed TCK (Test Compatibility Kit) for Portlet Spec 3.0 > > Please review the release candidate for this project which is found in the > following maven staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheportals-1026/ > > The source and other artifacts have been made available at the /dist/dev > directory: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/portals/pluto/ > > (These files will be promoted to /dist/release if the vote passes) > > The Release Notes are available here: > Pluto: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10560&version=12345426 > TCK: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10560&version=12345427 > > The KEYS file to verify the release artifacts signature can be found here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/portals/pluto/KEYS > > Please review the release candidates and vote on releasing Apache Portals > Pluto 3.1.1 > > REMINDER: According to the following policy: > http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval > "Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download all > signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that they > meet > all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, validate > all > cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the result on > their > own platform." > > Please review the release candidates and vote on releasing Apache Portals > Pluto 3.1.1 > > This vote is open for the next 72 hours. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1 for Release > [ ] 0 for Don't care > [ ] -1 Don't release (do provide a reason then) > > Kind regards and thanks in advance, > > Neil
