I intend to support Python 2.2 and greater---although the unit testing suite will probably only work with Python 2.4 and higher (since it requires the subprocess module). Support for Python 2.1 is being dropped (when I checked PLY-2.5 against Python 2.1, it didn't work anyways so this is probably fine at this point).
Regarding that syntax error in yacc, I've already fixed that in the subversion repository. So, a fresh checkout should fix the problem. Cheers, Dave On Mon 01/12/08 3:17 AM , "D.Hendriks (Dennis)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent: > Hello, > > This version of PLY runs on *both* Python 2.6 and Python 3.0 > > using a single code base. > OK. > > I personally consider the idea of maintaining two separate code > > bases for Python 2.X and Python 3.X to be unacceptable. > > So, I'm seeing if I can actually support both at the same time. > You mention 2.X here, but only 2.6 in the other message. I just > tried ply-2.6a1 with Python 2.3.4 and it didn't work, because of > a syntax error in yacc.py. My question is: exactly which versions > of Python will be supported by Ply 2.6? > Dennis > David Beazley wrote: > > Right now, PLY-2.6 should be a drop-in replacement for PLY-2.5 > aside from a few bug fixes. The final version will probably have a > few new things and some continued cleanup. I am also experimenting > with future Python compatibility. I personally consider the idea of > maintaining two separate code bases for Python 2.X and Python 3.X to > be unacceptable. So, I'm seeing if I can actually support both at > the same time. Cheers, Dave On Fri 28/11/08 12:35 AM , eliben > [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent: > > On Nov 27, 10:01 pm, David Beazley wrote:> For anyone who does > not have enough to do this holiday weekend, I just put together the > following alpha release of PLY-2.6> > > http://www.dabeaz.com/ply/ply-2.6a1.tar.gz> This version of PLY > runs on *both* Python 2.6 > > and Python 3.0 using a single code base. I can't really vouch for > the reliability of the Python 3.0 version, but it passes the unit > testing> suite. > > Feedback is welcome. Again, this version > > is highly experimental and should not be used for production code. > I'm mainly making it available for people to test under new Python> > versions over the next few weeks. I'm going to be making a final > PLY-2.6 release sometime in late December.> Dave, Does PLY-2.6 have > new features over 2.5 or just compatibility with the new Python ? Tx > Eli > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ply-hack" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ply-hack?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
