I'm almost wondering if PLY should just write the tables out as a pickle or something. Someone already patched it to do something similar. I could certainly make an option for doing it. Open to ideas on this.
Cheers, Dave On Mar 20, 2009, at 7:45 AM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > > Hello, > > As a last resort to solve this: is there a way to modularize the > generated code on parsetab.py? Mostly wishful thinking here I would > assume there isn't! > > Thanks a lot, > -- > Nuno Lopes > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Nuno Lopes > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> On 14 Mar 2009, at 03:34, David Beazley wrote: >> >>> Having looked at the parsetab.py file on this, this might be a >>> possibility. The file is pretty big and has some extremely long >>> unbroken >>> lines in it. Maybe it's bumping up against some kind of line- >>> length limit >>> or something. Very interesting. >> >> >> The size of the file seems to be problem, from the jython list I >> got this >> reply: >> >> The generated Java method is too big for the JVM to handle. >> >> <http://bugs.jython.org/issue527524> >> >> >> >> -- >> Nuno Lopes >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ply-hack" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ply-hack?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
