Another vote for leaving the optimization in some form.

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 7:46 AM, David Beazley <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree that focusing on pickling might be a sensible way to go about it.   
> Specifically, make it so that the instance returned by lex() and yacc() can 
> be pickled as desired by the user.
>
> I'm not planning any changes along these lines for Ply-3.5, but will consider 
> it in future releases later.
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
>
>
> On Apr 27, 2012, at 4:49 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 7:27 PM, David Beazley <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I've been thinking about some cleanup to PLY lately and have a question.  
>> Would anyone actually miss the table output in PLY (parsetab.py, lextab.py) 
>> if it were removed entirely?   Here's some context:
>>
>> The original version of PLY was developed on a 200 MHZ home computer about 
>> 12 years ago.   At that time, generation of the LALR tables was relatively 
>> expensive so creating table files was a way of caching the result and 
>> reusing it (much like Python uses .pyc files).   Today,  it's a bit 
>> different.   For instance, making the LALR tables for the ANSI C grammar 
>> (over 200 rules and nearly 350 states) on a modern machine only takes around 
>> a half a second.   Thus, I'm honestly wondering if I could just ditch all of 
>> that table reading/writing code and not worry about it.
>>
>> Does anyone have any particular thoughts about this?
>>
>> I use ply to parse the package declaration in my packaging tool bento, and 
>> the related command line tools would be significantly slower without the ply 
>> caching.
>>
>> OTOH, the current caching solution is a bit difficult to use in those 
>> situation: I think having a pickable object, and extracting the caching 
>> policy away from the main code would cover most usecases in that context.
>>
>> David
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "ply-hack" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/ply-hack?hl=en.
>



-- 
Joseph Tate
Personal e-mail: jtate AT dragonstrider DOT com
Web: http://www.dragonstrider.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ply-hack" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/ply-hack?hl=en.

Reply via email to