On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 19:58 -0400, Peter Jones wrote: > But if it is or not, pm hooks should be doing this, not g-p-m, because > (at least according to plan) it will be common to use NM independently > of the desktop.
Agree. When HAL depends on pm-utils, and g-p-m depends on this new HAL, then I can rip the code out of g-p-m. Richard. _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
