Holger Macht wrote:
I think pm-utils should be the only one writing a logfile about a thing it
knows about and actually executes.

Disagree; the logfile is to be owned by HAL since HAL provides the ABI/API to access / delete it. It's really just delayed error handling using a well-define mechanism. Plus, HAL now runs on FreeBSD / Solaris, I want it to work for them too without having them to use pm-utils [1].

Hmm, I guess we're arguing details right now.... which means we basically agree :-)

     David

[1] : though ideally they'd port pm-utils over but I'm not sure it's the right time to make such a strict requirement.

_______________________________________________
Pm-utils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils

Reply via email to