On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 11:43 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote: > Also, I'm extremely wary of including such things calling out to > closed-source stuff in the upstream of a free software project. Probably > ATI themselves should just require pm-utils and install the hook > themselves (easiest) or punt it to the distro packaging either the ATI > drivers or the pm-utils package.
Understood. > I really think that calling out to closed source stuff do not belong at > all in either HAL or pm-utils. I'm OK with providing the hooks for > people doing whatever they want though. > > Does that make sense? Sure. I would open a ticket for the ATI utilities, but their bugzilla is down[1]. I'll ask them to depend on pm-utils and add the lowpower.d script there. Thanks. Richard. [1] http://ati.cchtml.com/ _______________________________________________ Pm-utils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils
