On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 21:30 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> Before getting towards 1.0, shouldn't we move over from /etc/ to
> /usr/lib/pm-utils or something like that to be FHS compliant? Somebody
> mentioned recently to me that having these scripts in /etc/pm/hooks
> seemed
> a bit strange to him. I am not very good at that FHS stuff, but IIUC
> only
> configuration stuff should live in /etc?

Yes, stuff that's not a configuration option should not be in /etc -
also, I would really like to rename hooks into sleep.d or power.d to
signify that scripts can just be dumped there.

Richard.


_______________________________________________
Pm-utils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-utils

Reply via email to